Court: High Court at Malindi
Category: Criminal
Judge(s): William Ouko
Judgment Date: July 22, 2005
Country: Kenya
Document Type: PDF
Number of Pages: 3
Explore the case summary of Republic v Julius Karisa Charo [2005] eKLR, highlighting key legal principles and its impact on judicial outcomes. Ideal for legal professionals and students.Case Brief: Republic v Julius Karisa Charo [2005] eKLR1. Case Information:- Name of the Case: Republic v Julius Karisa Charo- Case Number: Criminal Case 7 of 2002- Court: High Court at Malindi- Date Delivered: 22 July 2005- Category of Law: Criminal- Judge(s): William Ouko- Country: Kenya2. Questions Presented:The central legal issue in this case revolves around the admissibility of a post-mortemexamination report in the absence of the original author, Dr. Kirasi Olumbe, and whether a policeconstable can produce such a report in court.3. Facts of the Case:The case involves the Republic as the prosecutor against Julius Karisa Charo, the accused. Theprosecution called PC Gilbert Sang to testify regarding the investigation and to produce a postmortemexamination report. The defense, represented by Miss Njoroge, objected to theadmissibility of the report on the grounds that it could only be produced by another qualifiedpathologist in the absence of Dr. Olumbe.
Below is the summary preview.
This is the end of the summary preview.
Share this with your network: